|
At C-cubed the CAUCASIAN CONVERTED-CHRISTIAN "CAN"NIBBLES, IN A FRENZY OF CANNIBAL RAISED DECIHELL
REVELRY OF RIVALRY decided to fight over the DIVIDENDS. THE DIVINE OBVIOUSLY HAS NO END, SO THE DIVIDENDS HAD TO SEEK ENDS
TO MEET THE MEANS SO MEAN THAT THE MEAN, MEDIAN AND MODE OF THE FABLED STATISTICAL AWARD WENT TO THE SAME OLD CROAK ANNOINTED
BY THE BRITS TWITS WAY BACK WHEN THEY NO DOUBT RAISED CHANDRASEKHAR SUBRAMANIAN FROM THE SAME FAMILY TREE THAT PRODUCED THAT
OTHER NOBELED TAMILIAN C.V.RAMAN TO DO A DOUBLE WHAMMY!
THAT IS PRECISELY THE POINT LACKING IN ALL PRESCIENCE, NE'ER MIND THE absolute nescience of the NOBEL NUSIANCE
NOT NEW-SCIENCE AWARDS THAT GOT PASSED AROUND LIKE SMARTIES FOR THE SMARMIES, THE ARMIES OF SMARMIES no sooner than that SCI-FICTION
RAG CALLED 'NATURE' PUBLISHED THE PULP FICTION SO THAT THE NUCLEAR BOMB WOULD BE READY BY THE TIME OF THE STATE PAID POET
LAUREATE SAMUEL BUT OFCOURSE BRITS TWITS PAID BUTLER CALLED YEATS!
AND NO THE YEAST WAS NOT USED FOR UNLEAVENED BREAD THAT THE MAKER'S BOY BROKE WITH, WELL THE WAY THE MAKER'S
BOY REFUSED TO BREAK BREAD WITH THE 'FISHES AND LOAVES' OF OFFICE AND RATHER LOAFED ALONG THE COASTLINE WHERE ST. PETER FISHED
IN DEEPEST GALILEE OR GEE HOW PROPHET ISAIAH HAD SUCH A WONDERFUL RANT IN THE WORK OF GOD IN WHICH THE GOD DOES NOT GET IN
A WORD IN HIS OWN WORDS!
SO THE COPYRIGHT FOR THAT-- NOW THAT IS THE POint of how every INSTITUTION IS MORE CONCERNED WITH HAVING IT'S
OWN WORD AS THE LAST WORD, AND NOT ONE WORD OF THE LOST WORD GETS IN A SNEEZE EDGEWAYS SO THE APOCRYPHA NOT THE APOCRYPHAL
STORY IS NOT HOW ALL THE MIDDLEEASTERN BELS AND CHURCHBELL MAKERS ENDED UP MINTING THE STUFF AND GOD GOT SOLD OUT BY JUDAS
FOR THIRTY SILVER AND THEN JUDAS ISCAROT GOT SO CARRIED AWAY HE COMMITTED SUICIDE!
SO THE ONLY TWO WHO WEREN'T SAINTED BY THE ROAM ROWDIES WHO RAN OFF WITH THE CHURCH, WERE THE VERY TWO WHICH
IS HOW THE EUROCENTRICKS ENDED UP WITH WELL LET BENEDICT SPINOZA SAY WHAT POPE BENEDICT NO DOUBT DID NOT HAVE DICTATED TO
BY THE HEAD OF CHURCH AND RELIGIOUS STATE OF OLE BLIGHTY WHEN HE ENDED UP ON A BUSBAY WITHOUT ANY SAY AS TO WHAT TO SAY IN
EITHER LATIN OR ANGLO-SAXONY BECAUSE................
THE TRIP WAS................
THAT'S WHAT?
WHEN THE MEDIA IS THE MEDIUM THE MODE OF THE EMAN TRICKS PLAYED BY THE MEDIA THAT PUTS OUT FAKE STORIES MADE
UP BY MILLLICENT................
AH! MILLICENT MOST RETICENT NOT MAN ENOUGH AND THE SPOOKS WHO SPOKE FOR THE ONES WHO NE'ER SPOKE BUT ENDED
UP PUTTING A SPOKE IN EVERY WHEEL AND ENDED UP wheeling and dealing in ................
THAT'S THE IN AND OUT OF IT. THE ONES WHO WERE TOTALLY OUT OF THE PICTURE GOT PICTURED IN AND
THE PIQUE CHOR GOT THE PICK OF THE WEAK?
WELL THE WEAK ALIBI IS THAT THE WEAK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH BECAUSE THE WEEK, THAT IS THE NEWSWEEK MAKES
A BIG SPLASH IN RETURN FOR CASH, AS HOW A WEAKLING WITH A WEAKLINK TO THE SEEKLINK CAN SEND THE SOARING COSTS OF COMPUTER
DIGITAL GAMES GO TO PLACES WHILE AT THE SAME TIME HAVING TO SWAP PLACES BECAUSE THE BRITS TWITS MESSED UP THE PRESIDENT'S
SPOUSE WHO HAPPENS TO BE DISGENDERED!
AH! AND THEN THE DISINGENIOUS DISTINGUISHED GUEST WHO ENDED UP WITH A SPOUSE THAT 'WAS' MIXED UP IN A MESSY
MIXUP WITH THE SPOUSE WHO WENT OFF TO A MATHIAS SPA FIRSTOFF AND THEN JODI JODI TO JODHPUR PURRING LIKE THE RAJ LINK
WAS ..........................
AN UNBROKEN LINE OF ROYALTY FROM WILL THE GOLGOTHA TO WILL THE MODERN MONARCH MAKER?
NOT GOLGOTHA OR CALVARY BUT THE CAVALRY KING TO COME WHO CAME FROM THE CLAN OF GOTHAS WITHOUT THE GOTHRAM OR
SOME SUCH GOTHIC CHURCHBIBLE NAME WRITING IN THE FIRST HALF FOLIO OR SOMESUCH STUFF THAT HAD FRANZ KAFKA DREAMING!
AH! THE AUSTRIAN LAWYER TRAINED AT CHARLES UNIVERSITY AT PRAGUE WHO HAD THE BRITS TWITS TRANSLATION BY WILLA
AND MUIR THOUGH HE EXPLICTLY FORBADE HIS BOOKS TO BE PUBLISHED AND WANTED HIS FRIEND MAX BROD TO HAVE THEM BURNED?
OR DESTROYED! BUT THAT IS THE LIKELY STORY THEY WOULD PUT OUT LIKE THE LIKELY DIARY ANNE FRANK NE'ER WROTE SO
THAT THE ROYAL RIP OFFS CAN DO EXACTLY THAT: DO THE ROYAL RIP OFF!
SO THOUGH IT WAS PROBS, MOST PROBS NOT WRITTEN BY FRANZ KAFKA NOR YET PASSED ON BY MAX BROD, just
the same as KARL MARX AND FREDDY ENGELS, here's the never ending lineage of line by line robbery of COPYRIGHTS!
'The Emperor-- so it [the parable] goes-- has sent a message to you, the HUMBLE SUBJECT--
THE INSIGNIFICANT SHADOW cowering in the remotest distance before the imperial sun; The Emperor from his deathbed has sent
a message to you alone. He has commanded the messenger to whisper the message to kneel down by the bed, and he whispered
the message to him, so much store did he lay on it that he ordered the messenger to whisper it back into his ear again.
Then by the nod of the head he has confirmed it is right. Yes, before the assembled specatators of his death-- all
the obstructing walls have been broken downAnd in front of the entire crowd of those witnessing his death—all
the obstructing walls have been broken down, and all the great ones of his empire are standing in a circle on the broad and
high soaring flights of stairs—in front of all of them he dispatched his herald. The messenger started off at once,
a powerful, tireless man. Sticking one arm out and then another, he makes his way through the crowd. If he runs into resistance,
he points to his breast where there is a sign of the sun. So he moves forwards easily, unlike anyone else. But the crowd is
so huge; its dwelling places are infinite. If there were an open field, how he would fly along, and soon you would hear the
marvellous pounding of his fist on your door. But instead of that, how futile are all his efforts. He is still forcing his
way through the private rooms of the innermost palace. Never will he win his way through. And if he did manage that, nothing
would have been achieved. He would have to fight his way down the steps, and, if he managed to do that, nothing would have
been achieved. He would have to stride through the courtyards, and after the courtyards through the second palace encircling
the first, and, then again, through stairs and courtyards, and then, once again, a palace, and so on for thousands of years.
And if he finally burst through the outermost door—but that can never, never happen—the royal capital city, the
centre of the world, is still there in front of him, piled high and full of sediment. No one pushes his way through here,
certainly not someone with a message from a dead man. But you sit at your window and dream of that message when evening comes."
SO THE AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN EMPIRE WITH FULLEST AUTHORITY OF THE DOUBLY PHONEY ANGLOSAXONY NO DOUBT ENDED UP
WITH PITCHBLENDE JOACHIM MINES THAT THREW UP STUFF THAT WENT INTO CERAMICS PARSING AROUND THE DYNAMITE AWARDS LIKE SMARTIES
FOR THE FAKERS WHO WOULD END UP BLOWING UP A FOOTBALL STADIUM IN CHICAGO!
There they go! When Fermi the one who was parked into the very premises where POPE INNOCENT III OR SOME
ROMAN NUMERAL WHO SENT OFF GALELEO GALELEI TO BE INCARCERATED GOT TO THE POINT WHERE HE NEEDED VERY BADLY TO BUY A GEIGER
COUNTER SO THAT THE RADIATION WOULD NOT HAVE TO MAKE HIM RUN A MARATHON FROM ONE LAB END TO THE OTHER LAB END TRYING TO CAPTURE
THE ELUSIVE PARTICLE PHYSICS IN PHYSICAL EXERTION FOR WHICH LINGERIE WASN'T LABELED LIKE RADIOACTIVE, YOU KNOW, NOT
LIKE FOOTBALLERS HANGERS ON WHO HAVE MADE A PACKET BY REVERSING THE OFTREPEATED CLICHE" 'LOVE IS BLIND' WHICH NO DOUBT IS
HOW BLINDFOLDED THEY MUST BE BE FOUND OUT IN BED, IN FLAGRANTE DELICTO, GETTING RIPPED OFF WELL NOT OF THE BITS OF FRIPPERY
THEY HAVE TO SELL TO BE ABLE TO PLAY FOOTBALL BY MAKING THEMSELVES BEING BOUGHT AND SOLD LIKE MEAT AND LARD OF SLAVES SO THINGS
HAVEN'T CHANGED ALL THAT MUCH FROM THE ROMAN COLLOSEUM AND AD NAUSEUM, WHERE THE AD REVENUES FIND NEWER AVENUES TO MAKE MORE
REVENUES FROM MORE REVELATORY VENEUES SINCE THE VOYEURS SET UP THE TABLOIDSEES THROUGH THE HIGH OFFICES OF THE HAGGIS THAT
IS THE HAG'S GIS, GETTING NOT ONLY THE GIST OF THE ENTIRE LIST OF WELL NOT DIRTY LINEN BY THE LINE BY LINE TEXTING OF THE
SEXUAL TEXTUAL POLITICS OF HOW THE PILE IS MADE BY TURNING THE CLICHE ON IT'S HEAD! IF LOVE IS BLIND WHY DO THEY NEED SO MUCH
LINGERIE IT MUST BE MAKING A MOCKERY OF DOUBLE-BLIND STUDIES BY WHICH FERMI AND HIS DANISH COUNTERPART STUDIED ANTI-MATTER
AS A MATTER OF FACT NOT, BUT DO NOTE HOW NIELS BOHR DID NOT WRITE THE FOOTNOTES ON WHAT THAT COLONIAL KICKUP RUTHERFORD COULD
NOT AFFORD TO FORK OUT A FORTUNE FOR TO HAVE A FOOTBALL STADIUM BLOWN UP IN CHICAGO SO THAT THE JUNIOR SENATOR WOULD BE PARACHUTED
STRAIGHT ONTO THE KURSI OF THE PRESIDENT'S PERCH WITHOUT HAVING TO GET A PURCHASE OF WELL FLYING BY THE SEAT OF HIS PANTS
HOW HE WILL BE FETED IN NEW DELHI WHICH JUST DID THE SCAMDALOUS GAMES OF COMMONWEALTH FREAK OUT ON A FARFETCHED SEVENTY THOUSAND
CRORES WITHOUT A STREAKER DOING A DITTO HAVING BEEN BETTED AND FETED BY A ROBBER ROGER CALLED ALKY!
WELL THE ALKY BIT WON'T BE SERVED BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT'S WIFE WILL NOT THE FETCH THE VOTE FOR THE PRIME
MINISTER WHO CAN'T FIND A SINGLE VOTE TO HAND WHEN HE SIGNS SOME SHADY DEALS WITH OBBIE THE CYBORG'S HENCHMEN WHO ARE DROPPING
DOWN LIKE DRIPPING REIGNS OF THE RAJ'S LEFTOVER LEGATEES WHO CAN'T TEE OFF ON THE GOLF CLUB AND REST OF THE EMAAR STUFF BECAUSE
THE BIT OF REALTY THAT WAS PARSED OFF FOR THE PARSI NO DOUBT HAD THE PARSI PARSED OFF FOR A HANDSUM HANDOUT TO HARVARD TO
BE FORWARDED ONTO HOWARD'S END WHICH NO DOUBT LEFT A FORWARDING ADDRESS FROM THE TIME FOSTER CAME ROUND TO BUGGER THE CHOKRABOYS
OR SOME SUCH TABLOIDSEE TOSH!
SO GOSH! WHAT DID AZIZ SAY TO THE ASSIZES COURT WHEN THE KANGAROO COURT DID NOT SPEAK IN THE PALI CANON?
JUST THE VERY PSYCHOLOGY THE VIENNESE QUACK NICKED FROM THE BUDDHA AND PARSED IT ONTO THE SWISS CHARLATAN
AS THE 'COMMONWEALTH OF THE SUBCONSCIOUS!'
THE COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS!
AH SIGI FREUD WAS A FRAUD AND SO WAS CARL JUNG WHO NICKED THE ENTIRE LOT FROM INDIA WHILE THE JAILBIRD WILHELM
NOT MEISTER WILHELM OF GOETHIC FAME BUT THE VERY INFAMY OF A JAILED BIRD BEING MADE THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OF THE I CHING!
WELL, SO THE VERY POINT OF THIS IS THAT, THAT WHEN TOLSTOY COULD NOT HAVE HAD A SINGLE LINE OF HIS OWN SAY
IN HIS OWN WAY IN RUSSIAN IN RUSSIA, HOW CAN WE EVEN BE SURE THAT THE SUREFIRE COPY OF 'WHAT IS ART' IS THE AUTHENTIC VERSION
AS PUBLISHED IN OLE BLIGHTY WHICH WAS CERTAINLY NOT THE SOVEREIGNTY HAVING THE HIGH TEA WITH THE MONARCHY OF THE TABLOIDSEE
OF OLE BLIGHTY WHICH ENDED UP TRANSLATING THE STUFF JUST AS IT DID WITH PARKING KARL MARX ON IT'S PREMISES AND ENDED UP WITHOUT
ANY SUCH PREMISE BUT SURPRISE SUPRISE GOT A FRANZ KAFKA TRANSLATED BY MUIR WHEN THE CENSORS WERE WEILDING THE SCISSORS ON
D H LAWRENCE AND DITTO ON JAMES JOYCE AND ON OSCAR WILDE WHO WON NO OSCARS FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING ERNEST EVEN AS THE
ANCIEN REGIME IN FRANCE WAS BEING OVERLY ZEALOUS BY HAVING THE IMPOTENT TRIED OUT IN COURT IN FULL COURT HAVING TO DO THE
FULL MONTY TO PROVE THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING WERE A PACK OF LIES TO GET AT THE ALIMONY OR GET OUT OF PARTING WITH THE ALIMONY!
ENLIGHTENED EUROPE, AS PARSE FOR THE COARSE BLAMED THE JEWISH SYNAGOGUE FOR THE SIN of sending off BENEDICT
SPINOZA TO SPIRAL OFF INTO A TIZZY OVER THE STATE OF THE STATE wherewhatwhen without asking why:
That in a Free State Every Man May Think what he Likes, and Say what he Thinks.
If men’s minds were as easily controlled as their tongues, every king would sit safely on his throne,
and government by compulsion would cease; for every subject would shape his life according to the intentions of his rulers,
and would esteem a thing true or false, good or evil, just or unjust, in obedience to their dictates. However, we have shown
already (Chapter XVII.) that no man’s mind can possibly lie wholly at the disposition of another, for no one can willingly
transfer his natural right of free reason and judgment, or be compelled so to do. For this reason government which attempts
to control minds is accounted tyrannical, and it is considered an abuse of sovereignty and a usurpation of the rights of subjects,
to seek to prescribe what shall be accepted as true, or rejected as false, or what opinions should actuate men in their worship
of God. All these questions fall within a man’s natural right, which he cannot abdicate even with his own consent.
I admit that the judgment can be biassed in many ways, and to an almost incredible degree, so that while exempt from direct
external control it may be so dependent on another man’s words, that it may fitly be said to be ruled by him; but although
this influence is carried to great lengths, it has never gone so far as to invalidate the statement, that every man’s
understanding is his own, and that brains are as diverse as palates.
Moses, not by fraud, but by Divine virtue, gained such a hold over the popular judgment that he was accounted superhuman,
and believed to speak and act through the inspiration of the Deity; nevertheless, even he could not escape murmurs and evil
interpretations. How much less then can other monarchs avoid them! Yet such unlimited power, if it exists at all, must belong
to a monarch, and least of all to a democracy, where the whole or a great part of the people wield authority collectively.
This is a fact which I think everyone can explain for himself.
However unlimited, therefore, the power of a sovereign may be, however implicitly it is trusted as the exponent of law
and religion, it can never prevent men from forming judgments according to their intellect, or being influenced by any given
emotion. It is true that it has the right to treat as enemies all men whose opinions do not, on all subjects, entirely coincide
with its own; but we are not discussing its strict rights, but its proper course of action. I grant that it has the right
to rule in the most violent manner, and to put citizens to death for very trivial causes, but no one supposes it can do this
with the approval of sound judgment. Nay, inasmuch as such things cannot be done without extreme peril to itself, we may even
deny that it has the absolute power to do them, or, consequently, the absolute right; for the rights of the sovereign are
limited by his power.
Since, therefore, no one can abdicate his freedom of judgment and feeling; since every man is by indefeasible natural right
the master of his own thoughts, it follows that men thinking in diverse and contradictory fashions, cannot, without disastrous
results, be compelled to speak only according to the dictates of the supreme power. Not even the most experienced, to say
nothing of the multitude, know how to keep silence. Men’s common failing is to confide their plans to others, though
there be need for secrecy, so that a government would be most harsh which deprived the individual of his freedom of saying
and teaching what he thought; and would be moderate if such freedom were granted. Still we cannot deny that authority may
be as much injured by words as by actions; hence, although the freedom we are discussing cannot be entirely denied to subjects,
its unlimited concession would be most baneful; we must, therefore, now inquire, how far such freedom can and ought to be
conceded without danger to the peace of the state, or the power of the rulers; and this, as I said at the beginning of Chapter
XVI., is my principal object. It follows, plainly, from the explanation given above, of the foundations of a state, that the
ultimate aim of government is not to rule, or restrain, by fear, nor to exact obedience, but contrariwise, to free every man
from fear, that he may live in all possible security; in other words, to strengthen his natural right to exist and work —
without injury to himself or others.
No, the object of government is not to change men from rational beings into beasts or puppets, but to enable them to develope
their minds and bodies in security, and to employ their reason unshackled; neither showing hatred, anger, or deceit, nor watched
with the eyes of jealousy and injustice. In fact, the true aim of government is liberty.
Now we have seen that in forming a state the power of making laws must either be vested in the body of the citizens, or
in a portion of them, or in one man. For, although mens free judgments are very diverse, each one thinking that he alone knows
everything, and although complete unanimity of feeling and speech is out of the question, it is impossible to preserve peace,
unless individuals abdicate their right of acting entirely on their own judgment. Therefore, the individual justly cedes the
right of free action, though not of free reason and judgment; no one can act against the authorities without danger to the
state, though his feelings and judgment may be at variance therewith; he may even speak against them, provided that he does
so from rational conviction, not from fraud, anger, or hatred, and provided that he does not attempt to introduce any change
on his private authority.
For instance, supposing a man shows that a law is repugnant to sound reason, and should therefore be repealed; if he submits
his opinion to the judgment of the authorities (who, alone, have the right of making and repealing laws), and meanwhile acts
in nowise contrary to that law, he has deserved well of the state, and has behaved as a good citizen should; but if he accuses
the authorities of injustice, and stirs up the people against them, or if he seditiously strives to abrogate the law without
their consent, he is a mere agitator and rebel.
Thus we see how an individual may declare and teach what he believes, without injury to the authority of his rulers, or
to the public peace; namely, by leaving in their hands the entire power of legislation as it affects action, and by doing
nothing against their laws, though he be compelled often to act in contradiction to what he believes, and openly feels, to
be best.
Such a course can be taken without detriment to justice and dutifulness, nay, it is the one which a just and dutiful man
would adopt. We have shown that justice is dependent on the laws of the authorities, so that no one who contravenes their
accepted decrees can be just, while the highest regard for duty, as we have pointed out in the preceding chapter, is exercised
in maintaining public peace and tranquillity; these could not be preserved if every man were to live as he pleased; therefore
it is no less than undutiful for a man to act contrary to his country’s laws, for if the practice became universal the
ruin of states would necessarily follow.
Hence, so long as a man acts in obedience to the laws of his rulers, he in nowise contravenes his reason, for in obedience
to reason he transferred the right of controlling his actions from his own hands to theirs. This doctrine we can confirm from
actual custom, for in a conference of great and small powers, schemes are seldom carried unanimously, yet all unite in carrying
out what is decided on, whether they voted for or against. But I return to my proposition.
From the fundamental notions of a state, we have discovered how a man may exercise free judgment without detriment to the
supreme power: from the same premises we can no less easily determine what opinions would be seditious. Evidently those which
by their very nature nullify the compact by which the right of free action was ceded. For instance, a man who holds that the
supreme power has no rights over him, or that promises ought not to be kept, or that everyone should live as he pleases, or
other doctrines of this nature in direct opposition to the above-mentioned contract, is seditious, not so much from his actual
opinions and judgment, as from the deeds which they involve; for he who maintains such theories abrogates the contract which
tacitly, or openly, he made with his rulers. Other opinions which do not involve acts violating the contract, such as revenge,
anger, and t he like, are not seditious, unless it be in some. corrupt state, where superstitious and ambitious persons, unable
to endure men of learning, are so popular with the multitude that their word is more valued than the law.
However, I do not deny that there are some doctrines which, while they are apparently only concerned with abstract truths
and falsehoods, are yet propounded and published with unworthy motives. This question we have discussed in Chapter XV., and
shown that reason should nevertheless remain unshackled. If we hold to the principle that a man’s loyalty to the state
should be judged, like his loyalty to God, from his actions only — namely, from his charity towards his neighbours;
we cannot doubt that the best government will allow freedom of philosophical speculation no less than of religious belief.
I confess that from such freedom inconveniences may sometimes arise, but what question was ever settled so wisely that no
abuses could possibly spring therefrom? He who seeks to regulate everything by law, is more likely to arouse vices than to
reform them. It is best to grant what cannot be abolished, even though it be in itself harmful. How many evils spring from
luxury, envy, avarice, drunkenness, and the like, yet these are tolerated — vices as they are — because they cannot
be prevented by legal enactments. How much more then should free thought be granted, seeing that it is in itself a virtue
and that it cannot be crushed! Besides, the evil results can easily be checked, as I will show, by the secular authorities,
not to mention that such freedom is absolutely necessary for progress in science and the liberal arts: for no man follows
such pursuits to advantage unless his judgment be entirely free and unhampered.
But let it be granted that freedom may be crushed, and men be so bound down, that they do not dare to utter a whisper,
save at the bidding of their rulers; nevertheless this can never be carried to the pitch of making them think according to
authority, so that the necessary consequences would be that men would daily be thinking one thing and saying another, to the
corruption of good faith, that mainstay of government, and to the fostering of hateful flattery and perfidy, whence spring
stratagems, and the corruption of every good art.
It is far from possible to impose uniformity of speech, for the more rulers strive to curtail freedom of speech, the more
obstinately are they resisted; not indeed by the avaricious, the flatterers, and other numskulls, who think supreme salvation
consists in filling their stomachs and gloating over their money-bags, but by those whom good education, sound morality, and
virtue have rendered more free. Men, as generally constituted, are most prone to resent the branding as criminal of opinions
which they believe to be true, and the proscription as wicked of that which inspires them with piety towards God and man;
hence they are ready to forswear the laws and conspire against the authorities, thinking it not shameful but honourable to
stir up seditions and perpetuate any sort of crime with this end in view. Such being the constitution of human nature, we
see that laws directed against opinions affect the generous minded rather than the wicked, and are adapted less for coercing
criminals than for irritating the upright; so that they cannot be maintained without great peril to the state.
Moreover, such laws are almost always useless, for those who hold that the opinions proscribed are sound, cannot possibly
obey the law; whereas those who already reject them as false, accept the law as a kind of privilege, and make such boast of
it, that authority is powerless to repeal it, even if such a course be subsequently desired."
BENEDICT SPINOZA
This is taught not only by reason but by daily examples, for laws of this kind prescribing what every man shall believe
and forbidding anyone to speak or write to the contrary, have often been passed, as sops or concessions to the anger of those
who cannot tolerate men of enlightenment, and who, by such harsh and crooked enactments, can easily turn the devotion of the
masses into fury and direct it against whom they will. How much better would it be to restrain popular anger and fury, instead
of passing useless laws, which can only be broken by those who love virtue and the liberal arts, thus paring down the state
till it is too small to harbour men of talent. What greater misfortune for a state can be conceived then that honourable men
should be sent like criminals into exile, because they hold diverse opinions which they cannot disguise? What, I say, can
be more hurtful than that men who have committed no crime or wickedness should, simply because they are enlightened, be treated
as enemies and put to death, and that the scaffold, the terror of evil-doers, should become the arena where the highest examples
of tolerance and virtue are displayed to the people with all the marks of ignominy that authority can devise?"
THA WAS WAY BACK IN MID SEVENTEETH CENTURY!
AND YET, THE JOKE OF MAKING LAWS CONTINUES MUCH THE SAME WITHOUT REPEALING THE REPELLING BITS OF RUBBISH LEFT BEHIND
BY RUBBER STAMPED ROGUES WHO ENDED UP BEING NOBEL LAUREATED BY THE DYNAMITE AWARDS THE DANES AND THE NORWEGIAN TRIBES DOLE
ALONGSIDE THE SWISS BANK ECONOMIC PRIZE FOR COMIC RELIEF FUND THAT THE CHRISTIAN CHARITY COLLECTS FROM THE COLONIES WHERE
CLONES OF CYBORGS GET TO SURF THE CYBERSPACE IN SEARCH OF PHISSING EXPEDITIONS!
SO SPARE US THE SMALL CHANGE OF CHANGE AS THE SLOGAN THAT WON OBBIE THE CYBORG A "BUS" CONNECTION TO MAKE THE
CINEMA ROBOT RAKE IN THE MOOLAH FROM A BUS CONDUCTOR TURNED CLONE!
GET REAL! REALITY SHOWS AIN'T FOR SLAVERY MART SWAPS ATWEEN MAN UNITED OR DIVIDED BY DIVIDENDS ACROSS REAL MADRID!
GET RID OF THE MAD!
THAT'S IT.
THE M.A.D MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION BIT OF LEGALESE HAS LOST IT'S LONG RUNNING LEASE WHEREBY THE ROBBER ROGERS
GET THEIR RUBBERS FROM SZILARD'S GIFT TO THE BRITISH ADMIRALTY!
THE JOACHIM MINES THAT SENT ACROSS A HORSE LADEN CART OF DIRT TO THE CURIES IS NOW A CURIO THAT WON'T EVEN RAISE
A RISIBLE RISE OUT OF THE JOKE DOING THE ROUNDS THAT ROGUE ELEMENTS FROM ROGUE STATES WOULD END UP WITH A BIT IN THEIR BELTS
WHEREBY THEY GET TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP TO BITS SO THAT THEY GET TO GLORY UP THERE!
GET REAL! IT AIN'T FOR REAL. IT NE'ER E'ER WAS FOR REAL!
IT WAS ALL ABOUT REALTY! WHEN LIVERMORE GOT SOLD FOR REALTY IN THE CLINTON PRESIDENCY, THE LILY LIVER DEAL BY
WHICH THE LIVERIED LIVE SHOW WHEREBY THE ONE WHO NE'ER E'ER WON AN ELECTION GOT TO PARSE OFF LAND TO A PARSI WHO GOT PARSED
OFF A FIFTY HEFTY TO BE HEAVED OVER TO HARVARD SO THAT WHEN OBBIE THE CYBORG GETS SEATED AT HIS BUS END, THE BUS CONDUCTOR
TURNED ROBOT WOULD RAKE IN THE MOOLAH FOR THE ROBBER ROGERS AND SO ON IN AN ENDLESS LINE OF MONARCHY FROM WILLIAM THE GREAT
TO WILLIAM THE GREAT CHANGEMEISTER WHO WILL MODERNISE THE MONARCHY VIA WILLA THE MUIR WHO NO DOUBT GOT A BIG PILE FROM FRANZ
KAFKA AND HIS DREAM DELIVERY FROM THE MONARCHY!
OVERARCHING AMBITION OF THE TUB THUMPERS AND THE TRIUMPHANT TRUMPETEERS WHO END UP AS PUPPETEERS FOR THE PULP FICTION
FRIGHT FACTORY OF NUCLEAR NOW CLEAN ENERGY CAN GET A COMPLETE CLEAN OUT!
The small scandinavian tribe that speaks norwegian or some such dialect that got folklored into the KALEVALE,
OR NOKIA'D BY HAVING THE SWEAT SHOPS IN THE FAR EASTS MAKING THE LITTLE THINGUMMIES THAT TRY TO MANIPULATE THE SUBCONSCIOUS
SUBCONSCIOUSLY OR BY SUBLIMINAL SUBJECT STATES WHEREBY THE STATE OF CHINA IS SUPPOSED TO ALL aTREMBLE at the COMPUTER CLONE
THAT GOT THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR PEACE WHOM THE CHINESE STATE HAS INCARCERATED FOR ELEVEN YEARS, AND THE NORWEGIANS ARE PUFFING
THEMSELVES WITH SELF-WORTHY PRIDE AT HOW THEY CAN STAND UP TO THE CHINESE TERRACOTA SOLDIERING TERROR BY MANIPULATING THE
MEDIA THAT RAN THAT LONE CHINESE LONGRANGER RIGHT INTO THE PATH OF THE COMMIE MACHINEGUN OR MILITARY TIANNAMEN SQAURE TANK
OR SOME SUCH TOSH AS SHOWN ON COLOUR TELEVISION BUT THE BIGGEST SCAM IS HOW THE ONES WHO VIDEOGRAPHED OR DIGITALLY AIRBRUSHED
THE TOPPLING TWIN TOWERS OF 9/11 NEVER GOT ANY AWARDS FOR THE SUPERB SHOT BY SHOT SHOOTING SKILLS WHICH SEEMED TO HAVE BEEN
SHOT AT EYE LEVEL PERSPECTIVE THAT DID NOT FADE INTO A 'V' AT THE HORIZON?
NOT 'V' FOR CHURCHILLIAN SQUEAKY ESTROGENIC VOICED VICTORY FADEOUT BUT THE INVERTED V POINT WHEREBY THE PERSPECTIVE
OF TWO PARALLEL LINES FADE OUT AT EYE LEVEL AT THE HORIZON!
SO HOW COME THE ONES WHO IF THEY WERE HUMAN INDEED AND NOT MERELY HUMANOID HUMBUGGED ALONG THE HAGGIS THAT IS
THE HAG'S GIS LINES, WERE SO HIGH UP IN THE SKY AS TO HAVE SHOT THE WHOLE SCENERY SHOT BY SHOT IN PERFECT, WELL NEAR PERFECT
TAKES WHATEVER IT TAKES THAT TOOK OFF "ELONA GAY" GALAVANTING OFF AFTER IT DROPPED DOWN THE LITTLE BOY BOY OH BOY BEFORE DOING
A DITTO WITH THE FAT BOY BOY OH BOY HOW COME THE PULTIZER DID NOT PULL OUT ANY PRIZES FOR THE PRIME TIME PHOTOGRAPHY NOR DID
THE EVER SO BRAVE SCANDINAVIAN TRIBES STAND UP TO THE MIGHTY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO HAVE THE MEN STAND UP
AND BE COUNTED?
THAT IS THE QUESTION. WHO WERE THEY?
WHERE WERE THEY WHEN THEY WERE FILMING THE THING WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING?
AS EYE-WITNESSES WHAT WERE DOING THERE UP THERE AT EYE LEVEL SO TO SPEAK!
THAT IS THE QUESTION. THE BURNING QUESTION. NOT HOW TAJ CONTINENTAL GOT BURNED DOWN TO DO A PERFECT TURNED DOWN
BED FOR OBBIE THE CYBORG AND BEFORE THAT TO HILLARY CLINTON THE SECY OF STATE BUT THE EYEBALL FOR EYEBALL WITH THE FULL EYELINER
LINED UP WELL EYEBALL TO EYE IT ALL UP AT EYE LEVEL?
THAT IS THE QUESTION.
NOT HOW THE CHILEAN PRESIDENT MADE A PILE FROM TAKING THE TROUBLE TO PICK UP THE MINES FROM THE SHAFT AFTER THE
SHIFT WENT DOWN THE SHAFT TO SPEAK BECAUSE HE WAS A TELLYMAN BEFORE HE WAS A TELLALL MAN SO TO SPEAK BUT HOW AMERICA NEVER
GOT ROUND TO TELL THE POINT AS TO HOW ELONA GAY DID NOT SAY WHAT MILLICENT NEVER GOT ROUND TO SAY: SAY SAY!!!
SO THERE!
|
